Is Belgian Federalism At Critical Juncture - 1373 Words

PSIR 303 Territorial Politics 127934 Alijan Artykov Is Belgian federalism at critical juncture? Abstract The aim of this paper is to analyse the basic processes pushes to federalism in Belgium,describe the current situation in the state and give my own assumption of future of the Belgium.I will use primarily official sourses and agreements to show different actors that can influence political sturcture 1.How Federation Was Established. To understand how Belgium into a federal system,we have to look into history of creation of Belgian State.Belgium was founded in 1830 as a result of Belgian Revolution with secession of southern provinces form Netherlands.Belgium has been an officially french-speaking constitutional monarchy.During 19th century in Belgium were 2 ethnic groups:Flanders(Dutch-speaking community) and Wallons(French-speaking community).After First World War received new lands from Germany and germans who lived on those territories became 3rd ethnic group in Belgium.Political elite at that time were french-speakers,which called upper class(bourgeoisie).While dutch-speakers make up a second

How Health Service Reform Has Influenced Access Of Organ...

Introduction The public health sector has experienced four major structural reforms. Over the period of reform, the key changes were designed to increase efficiency, improve health outcomes and reduce increasing health expenditures. This assignment will examine how health service reform has influenced access to organ donation. The primary focus will be towards live kidney donation. Further, it will critically provide an analysis to the nature of service delivery in the socio-cultural context that shapes current health policy in New Zealand (NZ). Moreover, the analysis will offer a methodology in executing the strategy. In NZ, the demand dialysis or renal replacement therapy (RRT) and a kidney transplant from a deceased or live donor is†¦show more content†¦Healthcare in NZ prior to 1840 can be best described as rural (Bamford-Wade, Nicholls, Tane, Mitchell, 2010, p. 78). NZ’s healthcare system which was based on the model adopted from the United Kingdom(UK) advanced following the colonial period. Exposure to innovations in surgery and health practices was a result of the First World War and disease outbreaks in the early 20th century. These events led to the centralisation of the structure of healthcare services to what was later recognised as the welfare state. Key challenges Maori and Pacific people have found it particularly difficult to get a transplant and are experiencing a higher burden of having of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal failure (ESRD) (Collins, 2010). ANZDTR reported that at the end of 2014 there were total of 4,306 people being treated for kidney failure: 2,678 people were on dialysis and 1,628 with a transplant: an increase of 4.1 percent for a period of one year (ANZDTR, 2014). The prevalence of dialysis and those that have had a kidney transplant has risen by 250 percent during the last 15 years (Kidney Health New Zealand, 2014). However, the current demand for kidney supply is not meeting the numbers needed as there is currently an excess of 550 patients listed to receive organs and only a 115 have had a transplant from a living or deceased donor in the year 2014 (ANZDTR, 2014). The Ministry of Health (MOH) has devised strategies and initiative to increase live kidney

The Technological Revolution Robo Brush

Question: Describe about the term for The Technological Revolution for Robo Brush? Answer: Robo Brush One use to comb hair almost every day multiple times. Combs are used for this purpose. This include a lot of steps such as detangling, scalp massage, setting etc. This takes time and effort and also sometimes seems to be a tedious job. Everyone likes to get a helping hand for this but mostly, they have to do this on their own. For this purpose, there was no technological device yet which could help to do these all without any effort. Many want to get rid of the process of detangling the hair and getting it properly groomed by themselves and are fond of getting it done by somebody else as they feel pampered when their hair scalp is massaged and blood flow is proper when the combing process is done properly (Shoham, 2013). So, a new device named Robo- Brush could be used for this which could do all this and could give an ecstatic feel of massage anytime and lessen the efforts of detangling. It is attached to a comfortable chair and is like inverted bowl with the movable bristles. There are various buttons in the panel attached to this device which could be used for various settings such as speed of hair brushing, brushing for scalp massage purpose or for detangling, adjusting according to the hair conditions, i.e., wet or dry, brush movement according to the length of hair, etc. There is also remote which could help to change settings according to the user with just few button clicks. This device could hence help t he users to have proper hair massage anytime without much effort. Its height could be adjusted according to the user. The bristles are made of different substances as per the preference of the user - it could be synthetic bristle, natural bristles, wood bristle, wet brush, etc. As per the willingness to pay, the types of bristles available in one set and types of settings and configurations could vary in the device (Merrin, 2014). The spacing in the bristles could be adjusted as for highly tangled hair, the space could be increased and as it gets detangled, spacing could be adjusted. Robo-Brush could be used on battery or could be directly plugged in. It could be available in variety of colors in which the most prominent ones are black, blue and white. This could be used by everyone and since most of the people like to get hair done by others as it makes them feel relaxed and detangling everyday is a tiresome process. A large market could be created in the coming time as people have very less time and everybody wants to keep himself or herself well groomed in terms of hair. For hair massages, they even use to go to parlors and pay hefty amounts for each time. By the introduction of this device, they could get this setup in their home only and according to their will, can configure the settings as well (Kawsar, 2013). Also, along with their hair getting groomed without their efforts, they could do some other tasks as they are free and just sitting on chair while getting their hair done. But, while using this, the user must be aware of few basic things such as the speed requirements. If one uses it on high speed and have fragile hair, it could lead to breakage (Mathieu, 2012). Also, settings should be done according to the hair types and should not be used for very small children as they could not explicitly advocate if they are facing any discomfort while getting their hair done due to lack of proper understanding. So, Robo- Brush is a very useful device with multiple functions which are not still available by any other technological device and could be very beneficial if used properly by understanding its correct mechanism. It is also not much expensive as most of the components are generic. In the current world where everything is getting machinated in order to decrease human indulgence, this would be preferred by many. For most of the people, it will create a good market as it meets the expectations of customers of getting their hair done without their efforts and in a proper efficient way. References: Feki, M. A., Kawsar, F., Boussard, M., Trappeniers, L. (2013). The internet of things: the next technological revolution.Computer, (2), 24-25. Mathieu, E., 2012.Hair Appliance Valet. U.S. Patent Application 13/365,331. Merrin, W., 2014. The rise of the gadget and hyperludic me-dia.Cultural Politics,10(1), pp.1-20. Shoham, A. and Pesmaa, O., 2013. Gadget loving: A test of an integrative model.Psychology Marketing,30(3), pp.247-262.

Sweeteners Essay Example For Students

Sweeteners Essay SweetenersSaccharin is an organic petroleum-based compound that is three to fivehundred times sweeter than sucrose. It is non-nutritive because the humanbody is unable to metabolize the foreign chemical. Saccharin does notcontribute calories; for this reason it is commonly used in diet foods. The obese feel that saccharin is their lifeline to slimdom, anddiabetics claim it is essential to control their blood sugar (Brody482). The same people who consume saccharin certainly would not knowinglyeat something that is classified as toxic waste; however, they do it on adaily basis. Saccharins alias is EPA Hazardous Waste number U202. Infact, workers who handle saccharin are cautioned, EXERCISE DUE CARE. AVOID CONTACT WITH EYES, SKIN, CLOTHING. WASH THOROUGHLY AFTER HANDLING. IF SWALLOWED, IF CONCIOUS, IMMEDIATELY INDUCE VOMITING (MSDS). We will write a custom essay on Sweeteners specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now Saccharin has always been surrounded by controversy. As early as 1907,the public was concerned over its safety and proposed banning it. Theodore Roosevelt, a diabetic, fought the idea. He said, My doctorgives it to me every dayAnybody who says saccharin is injurious tohealth is an idiot(Corcoran 12). Saccharin survived the onslaught foranother forty years. It wasnt until the bittersweet chemical hit themainstream consumer market in such things as diet sodas, pharmaceuticals,and chewing gum that it came under fire again. Scientists suggested thatsaccharin might be a carcinogen in 1951. In 1958, however, saccharin wasadded to the GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) list, another paradox. In 1972, the results of a long-term study showed that rats fed saccharinhad developed bladder tumors. Subsequently, the Food and DrugAdministration (FDA) removed saccharin from GRAS status and issued aregulation limiting the use of saccharin in foods. Then in 1974, aNational Academy of Science review f ound that, Saccharin itself could notbe identified as the cause of the tumors because of possible impurities aswell as problems with experimental design and procedures (Kennedy 131). Therefore, the FDA decided not to ban saccharin until they received theresults of a study being conducted in Canada. In March 1977, the Canadian study showed that feeding large doses ofsaccharin to pregnant rats and their weanlings produced bladder cancers inthe male offspring. The Canadians immediately banned saccharin. When theFDA announced its intentions to follow suit, public outcry led to aCongressionally voted eighteen-month moratorium. The American peoplewanted more time to evaluate the results of the study. Shortlythereafter, Congress enacted the Saccharin Study and Labeling Act, whichstayed the FDAs hand temporarily and ordered a warning label on allsaccharin products: Use of this product may be hazardous to your health. This product contains saccharin which has been determined to cause cancerin laboratory animals (Brody 482-483). Nonetheless, the moratorium hascontinually been extended until the present day. During 1978 and 1979, the National Cancer Institute and FDA conducted apopulation-based study on the possible role of saccharin in causingbladder cancer in humans. In general, people in the study who used anartificial sweetener had no greater risk of bladder cancer than thepopulation as a whole. However, when only the data for heavy users wasexamined, there was some suggestive evidence of an increased risk,particularly in persons who consumed both diet drinks and sugarsubstitutes and who used at least one of these two forms heavily(Carcinogenicity). In the study, heavy use was defined as merely six ormore servings of sugar substitute or two or more 8-ounce servings of dietdrink daily. Consequently, several studies have found that people withbladder cancer were more likely to have eaten food that containedsaccharin than were people who didnt have bladder cancer. The NationalCancer Institute compared the diets of 5,800 similar people who weredisease-free to the diets of 3,000 men and w omen with bladder cancer. Those who reported consuming high levels of saccharin on a daily basiswere found to be at a higher risk for association to poorly differentiatedbladder tumors (Corcoran 13). .ued3594c9a54c9d3d867a917264d918f3 , .ued3594c9a54c9d3d867a917264d918f3 .postImageUrl , .ued3594c9a54c9d3d867a917264d918f3 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ued3594c9a54c9d3d867a917264d918f3 , .ued3594c9a54c9d3d867a917264d918f3:hover , .ued3594c9a54c9d3d867a917264d918f3:visited , .ued3594c9a54c9d3d867a917264d918f3:active { border:0!important; } .ued3594c9a54c9d3d867a917264d918f3 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ued3594c9a54c9d3d867a917264d918f3 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ued3594c9a54c9d3d867a917264d918f3:active , .ued3594c9a54c9d3d867a917264d918f3:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ued3594c9a54c9d3d867a917264d918f3 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ued3594c9a54c9d3d867a917264d918f3 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ued3594c9a54c9d3d867a917264d918f3 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ued3594c9a54c9d3d867a917264d918f3 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ued3594c9a54c9d3d867a917264d918f3:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ued3594c9a54c9d3d867a917264d918f3 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ued3594c9a54c9d3d867a917264d918f3 .ued3594c9a54c9d3d867a917264d918f3-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ued3594c9a54c9d3d867a917264d918f3:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Chemicals Analysis EssaySaccharine is the most widely used sugar substitute in the world, and yetwe still do not fully understand its effects on the human body. Drinkingone can of diet soda per day can increase the risk of bladder cancer bysixty percent (Goulhart). The fact that it has never been conclusivelyproven to cause cancer in humans does not make saccharin safe. A dollarsworth of saccharin will do the sweetening of twenty dollars worth ofsugar; for this reason, the FDA will not decisively ban the chemicalsweetener. They are waiting for the results of